It’s coming. I swear.
I don’t know where it started today, but I do know that it has included instances of mislaid blame, making excuses for being FAT and both topless Britney Spears AND defending her “honor”.
So for lack of a better system, I’ll just go in the order that these topics just now came to mind.
Mislaid blame.
Some kid (and by “kid” I mean young man) riding a bike at high speed got himself killed by a delivery truck while very probably flying through an intersection on a fixed gear bike that was equipped with only a single brake in front.
As Seattle is overly bike-friendly, the cult of the biker wants to blame the driver of the truck. He must be to blame, right? He is a big, bad driver? Never mind the fact that he was driving that truck for his job, not the usual evil of being a single person commuter or just someone who happens to own a car and happens to drive it sometimes. Or the fact that people who drive for their job are more likely to be more careful because losing your job for running someone over is a pretty gigantic and super sucky bonus for simply running someone over.
Don’t get me wrong. I am the first to agree that most drivers, here and EVERYWHERE, suck obese ass. I like to drive. By which I mean, I like the feeling of accelerating in my vehicle, handling turns at high (but still safe) speeds, etc. That’s not something you can really do when you are driving in the midst of roughly 80 billion other drivers in this overcrowded motherfucker I live in. So generally speaking, I say that I like to drive – when there’s no one else around. And that includes bikers. You wanna know why? They are the BIGGEST FUCKING ROAD HAZARD OUT THERE.
Obviously, when you are driving a vehicle and about to turn right, you would not expect there to be a speeding vehicle in your path to your right, because you only turn right from the far right lane. The far right, except for (that is), the bike lane. You would however, still be looking out carefully for, say… pedestrians. However, pedestrians do not travel at speeds of about 30 mph. Therefore, if you check carefully before turning right, and see no pedestrians, chances are you won’t hit one with your vehicle. But no matter how carefully you check, or how slowly you turn, there is an excellent chance that you will hit a bike. Or even that one will hit you, as it comes flying past so fast that you wouldn’t be able to see it’s tidy sleekness under any circumstances. But where I live, even if some guy on a bike hits you going way too fast, it’s probably still gonna be your fault if you are driving a car.
So in the case I’m talking about, no one is really sure who is at fault. The truck driver is probably going to get blamed no matter what. I think bicyclists revel in the fact that shit like this makes people not wanna drive. And as you may have gathered from what I wrote above about drivers, I wouldn’t be complaining if there were less drivers out there.
I just can’t wait until some jackass on a bike hits me while I’m walking.
Moving right along….
Here we are again, blaming WHERE YOU LIVE for how fat you are. I’ve had this argument before. Low income people tend to live in neighborhoods where they do not have good access to healthy foods, yadda yadda yadda. I’ve also gotten totally yelled at for arguing that this isn’t a good fucking excuse.
I’ve been low income. It’s not like I’m exactly “high income” now. When my income was a lot lower though, I still shopped in a fucking grocery store, and purchased and consumed foods very similar to the ones I purchase and consume now. And guess what? I bought them at a grocery store NOT in my neighborhood, and I carried them home ON THE FUCKING BUS. (Oh, and for the record, I am neither obese, nor even fat. In fact, chubby would be a big stretch. Most people say I’m “skinny”, even though I know that there is fat in a few spots where I’d rather it not be.)
It is argued that lower income people also purchase lower priced foods with higher caloric density. Presumably so that they can purchase MORE food, with LESS money. Does anyone else see the math equation here, or do I have some super special radar that allows me to understand that if these people chose to spend more money on slightly less, higher quality, healthier food then YES! they’d have less food, and HALLEFUCKLUJAH! they might be less fat because not only would they be eating healthier food, they’d be eating less food period. How does this not add up to anyone but me?
The real irony here is that in times past, plumpness or even fatness, or even out-and-out obesity were signs of wealth and well-being. Because only people with lots of money could afford to eat a lot and didn’t have to do hard labor because they had serfs to do it for them.
I’ll add one little factoid in here that people would really, really hate me for. The article that brought this particular beef to my attention mentioned people who are less than able-bodied, such as diabetics, people with canes, etc. and how not only do they have a harder time walking in their ‘hoods and getting exercise because of their conditions, but that their conditions often cause them to be lower income, hence the reason that they are living in lower income neighborhoods with shitty sidewalks and whatnot.
This is where the meanness comes in, are ya ready for it? In times past, these problems didn’t exist because people in this condition died. Their lives were not artificially prolonged, dragging them through years of misery as fat people who could barely walk or afford to eat healthy, nutritious food. It is only in the last hundred or so years that we insist on making sure that everyone lives, at any cost, even if their lives are miserable. I’m not saying we should kill the disabled, or even just let them die, obviously that’s mean. But can’t we at least recognize that it’s just not natural for them to survive and that’s why they’ve got it rough? I don’t know how to conclude this thought, as it has no logical conclusion. I guess the only way to do so is to clarify my point, which is, that as awful as it sounds, I just don’t have any sympathy.
Oh yeah. BRITNEY!!!
I hate to say I told you so, but I was way ahead of the curve on hating Britney. Back in the days when she was everybody’s darling, cute as a button, virginal, etc, etc, ad barfinum – I fucking hated her. And I coulda told ya that her story would get to this pathetic chapter.
Poor, poor Britney with no hair, bad wigs and making poor wardrobe choices for her flop of a “comeback”. Whatevs, girlfriend. Put your shirt back on – and don’t forget your panties either – and stay home for a year or so until your hair grows back. That should give you plenty of time to practice up on your lip-synching. Oh, and maybe a bit here and there to raise your children? Hmmmm?